Table Of Content
Here's the short answer: Topaz's video upscaler now ships as Topaz Video (formerly Topaz Video AI), a desktop app that reconstructs missing detail with model-per-content-type AI. If you're searching for it today, the two things you want to know are whether it still exists, and whether the new subscription is worth it over the alternatives — this review answers both.
Unlike conventional scalers that simply stretch pixels, Topaz Video analyzes motion vectors, edges, textures, and noise patterns frame-by-frame, then uses trained AI models to predict and reconstruct missing detail at the target resolution.
Each Topaz upscale model is trained for a specific footage type — Proteus for general live-action, Rhea for texture-heavy 4× upscales, Gaia for anime/CGI, Iris for faces, Starlight for severely degraded sources. That model-per-content-type approach is what separates Topaz from simple bicubic or Lanczos upscalers.
Platforms: Windows 10/11 (64-bit) and macOS 12+ (Intel + Apple Silicon M1/M2/M3/M4)
Required GPU: NVIDIA RTX 30-series or newer with ≥ 8 GB VRAM recommended
Topaz Labs discontinued Topaz Video AI in September 2025, with v7.1.5 as the final legacy build. It has been replaced by a product called simply Topaz Video, which is subscription-only. Existing installs of v7.1.5 still run, but new users get Topaz Video, and continued access to the latest models requires an active subscription.
Before testing performance, here's what each Topaz Video upscaler model does and when to use it. Topaz's 2026 lineup keeps the earlier Proteus / Rhea / Gaia / Iris / Starlight core and adds several refreshed models on top.
| Model | Best For | Max Output / Upscale Factor | New in 2026 | Notes |
| Proteus / Proteus Natural | General live-action | Up to 4× / 4K | Proteus Natural | The default "go-to"; balances sharpness with natural texture |
| Rhea / Rhea XL | Aggressive 4× with detail | 4× only (fixed) | — | Texture king; slow but excellent brickwork, fabric, skin. Rhea XL trades even more time for a touch more fine detail on high-res sources. |
| Gaia / Gaia 2 | Anime & CGI | Up to 4× | Gaia 2 | Crisp line art, stable color; Gaia 2 tightens motion edges |
| Iris | Face enhancement | Custom 1×–4× | — | Eyes, skin texture, facial detail recovery |
| Starlight (Precise 2.5 / Fast 2 / Mini) | Severely degraded footage | Up to HD | Precise 2.5, Fast 2, Mini | Diffusion-AI; "reimagines" detail. Fast 2 and Mini trade some quality for speed on lighter jobs. |
| Astra 2 | Flagship general upscaler (cloud-capable) | Up to 4K | Yes (April 2026) | Topaz's current flagship — reach for it when you want the newest model without picking a niche |
| Nyx XL | Noise reduction alongside upscale | Up to 4× | Yes | Heavier-duty denoise pass than the classic Nyx |
| Hyperion 2 | SDR → HDR conversion | Same resolution | Yes | Companion to upscaling rather than a scaler itself |
My default picks: reach for Proteus (or Astra 2, if you want the newest flagship) when in doubt; save Rhea for texture-critical stills-like shots; use Starlight only when the source is genuinely broken. Of the 2026 additions, Astra 2 is the one that matters most for upscaling — Nyx XL and Hyperion 2 are supporting engines, not upscalers.
To evaluate how each model performs in real scenarios, we tested Topaz AI video upscale using the following system:
Test system:
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics
The default “go-to” for most live-action content, excelling at balancing sharpness with natural textures.
Result: Sharp, artifact-controlled output. Foliage and skyline edges stay clean. Good Edge definition without over-sharpening. Proteus is the model you should reach for when you don't know which one to pick.
This model specializes in 4x upscaling and detail boosting, ideal for enhancing fine structure and surface fidelity.
Result: Excellent brickwork and surface reconstruction. Trade-off: Rhea is ~7× slower than Proteus — not a practical pick for long-form or batch jobs unless maximum detail matters.
This is Topaz anime model, designed for high-quality and animation inputs, ensuring crisp linework, vibrant color, and refined CGI output.
Result: Clean line work, stable color consistency. Weakness: slight softening around motion edges and occasional shadow flattening during fast action sequences.
Focused on face enhancement, Iris intelligently restores facial details, particularly in low- to mid-quality or interlaced footage.
Result: Clear eye detail, realistic skin texture, subtle facial feature recovery — without the "uncanny smoothness" artifact that can appear in aggressive face models.
Starlight stands out as Topaz's most ambitious model. In severely degraded or artifact-heavy clips, it produced excellent temporal consistency and noticeably smoother motion reconstruction.
However, processing times increased dramatically, and hardware utilization spiked significantly. Rendering was substantially slower than other models.
One practical tip from my own runs: on genuinely low-res sources (around 480p), Proteus at 2× produces cleaner output than pushing straight to 4× — the aggressive factor tends to hallucinate texture where the source has none. And be honest with expectations: results are strong on decent 1080p sources but degrade on very low-res or out-of-focus footage regardless of which model you pick.
The short answer: on an RTX 4070, Proteus runs at roughly 7–8 fps, Rhea drops to about 1 fps, and Starlight is slowest of all. In practical terms, one minute of 720p source takes around four minutes on Proteus, thirteen-plus minutes on Rhea, and can stretch to 30–45 minutes on Starlight.
| Model | Source (RTX 4070) | Processing Time | Throughput |
| Proteus | 30 s @ 360×640, 30 fps → 4K | 1 min 47 s | ~7.85 fps |
| Rhea | 30 s @ 720×1280, 30 fps → 4× | 13 min 30 s | ~1.10 fps |
| Gaia | 1 min 59 s @ 720×720, 30 fps | 9 min 37 s | ~6.19 fps |
| Iris | 25 s @ 640×360, 25 fps | 1 min 13 s | Real-time-ish |
| Starlight | Heavily degraded source | ~30–45 min per source minute | Slowest of the lineup |
| Model | Relative Speed | Quality Ceiling | Best Use |
| Proteus | Fast | High | Default for live-action |
| Rhea | Slow | Very High | Texture-heavy 4× |
| Gaia | Medium | High | Anime (when speed isn't critical) |
| Iris | Fast | High | Face / portrait restoration |
| Starlight | Very Slow | Highest | Severely degraded sources |
For more details on these models, you can watch this video:
If you’re wondering how to use Topaz Video AI, and you already own a license or are running the watermarked demo, here’s the shortest path to a completed upscale.
In October 2025, Topaz Labs retired the perpetual license. All new users are now on annual subscriptions.
| Plan | Price | Included |
| Topaz Video (standalone) | ~$299/year | Full Topaz Video app, all local upscale models, limited cloud credits |
| Monthly options | ~$33–$67/mo | Month-to-month access to Topaz Video |
| Topaz Studio Bundle | ~$399/year | Adds Photo AI and Gigapixel alongside Topaz Video |
Pricing as of July 2026. One thing worth calling out: the annual plan locks you in for a full year — there is no mid-year cancel-and-refund, so factor that into the long-term math in the TCO section below.
Free Trial — Topaz offers a demo (no credit card required), but every exported clip is watermarked. You can preview output quality and test hardware speed, but you can't ship production work.
Important: the old "buy-it-once" perpetual license is no longer available for new users. Continued access to the latest AI models requires ongoing subscription payments.
These limitations often lead creators to ask a simple question: is there a Topaz Video AI alternative that offers similar upscaling quality, but with faster performance, easier usability, and better value? If so, keep reading.
Topaz Video is desktop-only and wants an NVIDIA RTX 30-series or newer card with at least 8 GB of VRAM. Many readers simply don't have that hardware — a MacBook Air, a mid-range laptop, or an older desktop won't clear the bar. Here are the genuine no-GPU paths worth knowing about.
If you want a Topaz ai video upscaler alternative that delivers comparable quality at faster speed, lower long-term cost, and simpler UX, UniFab Video Upscaler AI is the most direct replacement in 2026.
UniFab Video Upscaler AI is part of UniFab All-In-One — a $319.99 lifetime-license suite containing 22 AI tools (19 paid modules plus 3 forever-free tools: Video Converter, Background Remover, Vocal Remover). It runs on both Windows and macOS (Intel + Apple Silicon) and falls back to FabCloud cloud processing when your GPU can't keep up.
| Use Case | UniFab Video Upscaler AI | Topaz Upscale |
| General enhancement | Equinox (Fast / HQ) | Proteus |
| Texture / detail | Vellum | Rhea |
| Animation / cartoon | Kairo | Gaia |
| Cinematic / film | Titanus (Ultra-Fast / Fast / HQ) | Starlight (HQ only, slow) |
To move beyond the spec sheets, we conducted a series of hands-on, real-world comparisons—using the exact same footage, hardware, and settings—between Topaz and UniFab’s key models. This approach ensured that our findings reflect practical performance and user experience, not just theoretical benchmarks. What follows are objective observations on speed, output quality, and workflow efficiency for both platforms.
To ensure a fair, repeatable assessment, we ran all upscaling tests on the same hardware—NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GPU and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G CPU—with standardized sample clips. This approach allowed us to isolate the true differences between Topaz and UniFab, free from hardware or software version bias.
Source: 30-second urban landscape, 360 × 640, 30 fps → target 4K
| Tool | Time | Speed | Quality |
| UniFab Equinox | 1 min 3 s | 13.33 fps | Sharp, artifact-free results without over-sharpening or loss of detail |
| Topaz Proteus | 1 min 47 s | 7.85 fps | Sharp, artifact-free results without over-sharpening or loss of detail |
Verdict: Equinox is ~70% faster with identical visual output. For batch work, the efficiency Edge is material.
Source: 30-second cityscape, 720 × 1280, 30 fps
| Tool | Time | Speed | Quality |
| UniFab Vellum | 9 min 8 s | 1.65 fps | Clean textures, natural lighting |
| Topaz Rhea | 13 min 30 s | 1.10 fps | Clean textures, natural lighting |
Verdict: Vellum wraps a texture-heavy 4× job ~33% faster than Rhea. Quality is virtually indistinguishable to the naked eye. Trade-off: Vellum is fixed at 4×; Rhea lets you choose any scale factor.
Source: 1 min 59 s anime clip, 720 × 720, 30 fps
| Tool | Time | Speed | Quality |
| UniFab Kairo | 4 min 42 s | 12.66 fps | Sharper line art, richer color, better layer separation |
| Topaz Gaia | 9 min 37 s | 6.19 fps | Solid, but occasional shadow flattening and motion blur |
Verdict: Kairo is over 2× faster AND visibly sharper than Gaia on anime sources — the clearest win in this comparison.
Topaz Starlight remains the gold standard for VHS / 360p-era restoration — diffusion AI produces temporal consistency nothing else matches today. But render times explode and output caps at HD.
UniFab's Titanus (Ultra-Fast / Fast / HQ) delivers 4K output significantly faster on film & TV sources, and runs on lower-tier hardware, but doesn't match Starlight on the most degraded sources.
UniFab Video Upscaler AI is bundled inside UniFab All-In-One — so one license covers far more than just upscaling.
| Feature | UniFab All-In-One | Topaz Video |
| License Model | Lifetime (one-time) | Subscription only (Oct 2025 onward) |
| Price | $319.99 one-time | ~$299/year (standalone) |
| Trial | 30-day, no watermark | Demo, watermarked |
| Upscaling models | Equinox / Vellum / Kairo / Titanus (+ RTX Rapid Upscaler) | Proteus / Gaia / Theia / Artemis / Rhea / Starlight |
| Face Enhancement | Face Enhancer AI | Iris |
| SDR → HDR | HDR Upconverter AI (HDR10 / Dolby Vision) + RTX RapidHDR | Hyperion |
| Noise Reduction | Denoise AI + RTX Rapid Denoiser AI | Nyx / Artemis |
| Frame Interpolation | Smoother AI | Apollo / Chronos / Aion |
| Deinterlacing | Deinterlace AI | Dione |
| Stabilization | Video Stabilizer AI | Stabilization |
| Colorization (B&W) | ✅ Video Colorizer AI | ❌ Not available |
| Subtitle Generation | ✅ Subtitle Generator AI | ❌ Not available |
| Video Translation | ✅ Video Translator AI | ❌ Not available |
| TV Show Converter | ✅ | ❌ |
| Background Remover | ✅ (free) | ❌ |
| Audio Upmix | ✅ | ❌ |
| Vocal Remover | ✅ (free) | ❌ |
| Cloud Processing | ✅ FabCloud built-in | ❌ Local only |
| Hardware Requirement | Mid-range GPU or FabCloud | NVIDIA RTX 30+ / 8 GB VRAM |
| Update Cadence | 50+/year, free forever | Only while subscribed |
| UI Complexity | Simple (AI Autopilot) | Advanced, manual |
After the October 2025 subscription switch, total cost of ownership matters more than sticker price. Here's what you pay over time:
| Years | UniFab All-In-One | Topaz Video AI | You Save with UniFab |
| 1 | $319.99 | $299 | -$21 |
| 2 | $319.99 | $598 | $278 |
| 3 | $319.99 | $897 | $577 |
| 5 | $319.99 | $1,495 | $1,175 🔥 |
| 10 | $319.99 | $2,990 | $2,670 🔥 |
UniFab breaks even at month 13. Every month after is pure savings.
Use Topaz Video if you're a professional film restorer leaning heavily on Starlight for damaged sources, you need granular per-parameter tuning, and you already own an RTX 30-series or newer GPU. The annual subscription is defensible for working pros.
Use UniFab All-In-One if you upscale anime, restore general live-action, process batches, or work on a Mac / mid-range PC. UniFab matches Topaz on quality for most real-world clips, beats it outright on anime (Kairo > Gaia in our tests), runs faster, adds 15+ tools Topaz doesn't have at all, and costs $319.99 once instead of $299 every year.
Our full UniFab vs Topaz head-to-head goes deeper on the side-by-side benchmarks.
Yes. Topaz Video AI is a dedicated topaz video upscaler designed specifically for AI-based video upscaling. Five models (Proteus, Rhea, Gaia, Iris, Starlight) handle different content types — live-action, anime, faces, degraded footage — and output up to 4K or 8K from SD/HD sources. Workflow: drop a file, pick a model, click Export.
No. Topaz Video AI requires a $299/year subscription as of October 2025 (the one-time perpetual license was retired). A free demo is available, but every exported clip is watermarked, so you can't use the output for finished projects. If you need a free full trial, UniFab Video Upscaler AI offers a 30-day no-watermark trial.
Yes. The app formerly named Topaz Video AI was discontinued in September 2025 — v7.1.5 is the final legacy build. Topaz Labs replaced it with a product called Topaz Video, which is subscription-only. Existing v7.1.5 installs still run; new users get Topaz Video.
Topaz Video handles video only. For still-image upscaling, Topaz Labs sells separate products — Gigapixel and Photo AI. This review and Topaz Video itself are strictly about video; image users should look at Gigapixel instead.
Windows 10/11 (64-bit) or macOS 12+ with Apple Silicon support. Topaz officially recommends an NVIDIA RTX 30-series or newer GPU with ≥ 8 GB VRAM, 16 GB RAM (32 GB recommended), and a modern CPU with AVX2 support. Lower-tier GPUs will crash or slow to a crawl on Rhea, Gaia, and Starlight.
Yes. Topaz Video AI is compatible with macOS 12+ and optimized for M1/M2/M3/M4 chips — often running cooler than on comparable Intel Macs. However, Apple Silicon performance still lags high-end NVIDIA GPUs on heavy 4K+ restoration. UniFab's FabCloud sidesteps the hardware limit entirely for Mac users.
Yes. Topaz Video is a legitimate desktop application from Topaz Labs with no malware or spyware, and downloads from the official Topaz site are safe. Avoid unauthorized third-party builds — they often carry trojans and can't receive model updates anyway.
The most direct free-with-real-output route is UniFab Video Upscaler AI's 30-day trial (no watermark, full features). Open-source pipelines like Video2X and DaVinci Resolve's Super Scale are also improving; our roundup of Topaz Video AI alternatives covers the full free-and-paid shortlist so you can match a tool to your source type.