Topaz Video AI Frame Interpolation 2026: Apollo vs Chronos vs Aion (Tested)

Topaz Video AI frame interpolation uses three AI models — Apollo, Chronos, and Aion — to generate new frames between existing ones, turning 24/30 fps source into 60/120 fps smooth output or up to 16× slow motion. Apollo handles non-linear motion best (handheld shake, fast pans). Chronos is the standard for clean FPS conversion. Aion is the 2026 flagship for 4K+ at large motion. After running identical sports, animation, and dialogue clips through all three on an RTX 4070, my pick for topaz video ai frame interpolation in 2026 is Aion for top quality, Chronos Fast for batch speed — and UniFab Smoother AI when you want comparable results without the $299/year subscription Topaz adopted in October 2025. This topaz frame interpolation review covers what each model does, real RTX 4070 benchmarks, the Apollo vs Chronos decision, and a head-to-head with UniFab Smoother AI.
Topaz Video AI Frame Interpolation Review

What Is Topaz Video AI Frame Interpolation?

Topaz Video AI frame interpolation is the AI-driven workflow inside Topaz Video AI that generates new in-between frames to increase smoothness or create slow motion. Instead of simply duplicating frames, the AI analyzes motion vectors and content between adjacent frames, then synthesizes new frames that preserve detail and avoid the "ghosting" artifacts traditional optical-flow interpolation produces.

The three current models — Apollo, Chronos, Aion — are not interchangeable. Each was trained on different motion patterns. Picking the wrong model wastes hours of render time on a result you'll throw out.

topaz video ai frame interpolation models

Key Frame Interpolation Features in Topaz Video AI

Topaz Video AI includes several advanced features specifically designed for AI-based frame interpolation:

  • FPS Conversion: Converts standard frame rates (24fps, 30fps) into smoother outputs like 60fps or 120fps.
  • AI Slow Motion: Generates up to 16× slow motion by creating high-quality intermediate frames.
  • Duplicate Frame Removal: Detects and replaces repeated frames to prevent stuttering.
  • Motion Sensitivity Control: Allows users to fine-tune motion detection sensitivity for different footage types.

Common Use Cases for Topaz Frame Interpolation

Frame interpolation in Topaz Video AI is especially effective in the following scenarios:

  • Enhancing old or low-frame-rate videos to modern standards
  • Smoothing choppy or uneven motion
  • Creating cinematic slow motion for sports, action, or creative projects
  • Converting standard footage into high-frame-rate video for modern displays

Topaz Apollo vs Chronos vs Aion — Model Comparison Table

Topaz Video AI offers multiple frame interpolaiton AI models optimized for different motion scenarios. The main models are Apollo, Chronos, and Aion. Choosing the right model is critical for achieving the best interpolation results. 

Here's a quick comparison table:

ModelStrengthBest ForSpeed (RTX 4070)Variants
ApolloNon-linear motion, handheld shakeRun-and-gun footage, slight blur, organic motionMediumApollo, Apollo Fast
ChronosClean FPS conversion24→60 fps, 30→60 fps, cinematic slow-moMedium-FastChronos, Chronos Fast
Aion (2026)Large motion + 4K+ resolutionHigh-resolution sports, complex action, 4K+ slow motionSlow (highest quality)Aion (single variant)

Quick decision rule: 

  • Handheld phone or action-cam footage → Apollo
  • 24p film → 60p TV / smooth slow-mo → Chronos
  • 4K+ at heavy motion or maximum quality → Aion

Apollo Model: When to Use It

Apollo is built for organic, non-linear motion — the shaky stuff. It handles handheld camera footage, run-and-gun documentary work, action-cam, and clips with mild motion blur better than the older Chronos baseline.

topaz frame interpolation - apollo model performance

Apollo Fast is a streamlined variant for speed when you're processing long-form footage or batch jobs. You trade ~10–15% quality for roughly 2× the throughput.

Use Apollo when: 

  • Source has handheld or organic motion
  • Footage has slight existing blur (Apollo is more forgiving)
  • You're going from 24/30 fps → 60 fps for smoother social-media playback
  • Quick turnaround matters more than maximum precision

Avoid Apollo when: 

  • The source is locked-off cinema with predictable linear motion (use Chronos)
  • You need extreme slow motion at 4K+ (use Aion)

Chronos Model: When to Use It

Chronos is the standard frame-rate converter — the model most editors reach for first. It excels at clean FPS conversion: 24 fps → 60 fps for streaming, 24 fps → 120 fps for 5× slow motion, or any factor in between.

topaz frame interpolation - chronos model performance

Chronos Fast drops processing time roughly in half with a small quality penalty. For straightforward FPS conversion projects this is often the right pick.

Use Chronos when:

  • Source is locked-off or stable (gimbal, tripod, cinema cameras)
  • You need precise FPS targets (24/30/60/120)
  • Motion is predominantly linear (camera pans, dolly shots, even subject motion)
  • You want a reliable result with default settings

Avoid Chronos when: 

  • Footage has heavy handheld shake (use Apollo)
  • Source is 4K with large displacement motion (use Aion)

Aion Model: When to Use It

Aion is the 2026 flagship interpolation model. It was trained on high-resolution sources with large motion displacements — exactly the cases where Apollo and Chronos historically produced "tiling" artifacts at 4K+. Aion fixes those edge cases at the cost of slower processing.

topaz frame interpolation - aion model performance

Use Aion when: 

  • Resolution is 4K or higher
  • Subject crosses a large portion of the frame between frames (sports, drone, fast pans)
  • You want maximum quality and don't mind 2–3× longer render times
  • Apollo and Chronos produced visible tiling/seam artifacts on the same clip

Avoid Aion when:

  • Source is HD or below — you're paying for headroom you can't see
  • Render budget is tight; Chronos Fast usually finishes 3× sooner

Real-World Performance Tests on RTX 4070

Test System 

  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics

Test Clips 

  • 30-second handheld outdoor walk (1080p, 30 fps → 60 fps)
  • 30-second locked-off cinema dialogue (1080p, 24 fps → 60 fps)
  • 30-second 4K drone fast pan (3840 × 2160, 30 fps → 60 fps)
ModelSourceTargetTimeSpeed
Apollo1080p 30 fps handheld60 fps4 min 18 s6.97 fps
Apollo Fast1080p 30 fps handheld60 fps2 min 15 s13.3 fps
Chronos1080p 24 fps cinema60 fps3 min 52 s7.76 fps
Chronos Fast1080p 24 fps cinema60 fps1 min 58 s15.3 fps
Aion4K 30 fps drone60 fps23 min 41 s1.27 fps

Quality verdict

  • Apollo handled the handheld walk cleanly; very few ghost artifacts on swinging arms
  • Chronos converted the cinema dialogue 24→60 with no perceptible artifacts on close-ups
  • Aion produced the cleanest 4K drone result — minimal tiling on fast pans where Chronos showed seams

How to Use Topaz Frame Interpolation (Step-by-Step)

If you’re wondering how to use Topaz Video AI, here’s the shortest path to a completed upscale.

  1. Open Topaz Video AI and import your source clip (drag-and-drop or File → Open).
  2. Pick the right model — Apollo for handheld, Chronos for cinema/clean FPS conversion, Aion for 4K+ heavy motion.
  3. Set target frame rate in the inspector — 60 fps for smooth playback, 120 fps for 5× slow-mo, 240 fps for 10× slow-mo.
  4. Choose Fast or Quality variant if available — Fast for batch/long-form, default for single-clip top quality.
  5. Run a 5-second preview to check for artifacts (ghosting, tiling, seam lines around moving subjects).
  6. Configure export — codec (H.264 / H.265 / ProRes / DNxHR), bitrate, container (MP4 / MOV / MKV).
  7. Click Export and let it render. Aion at 4K will tie up your GPU for hours; queue overnight.

Pricing & Trial

In October 2025 Topaz Labs retired the perpetual license.

PlanPriceIncludes
Personal$299/yearApollo / Chronos / Aion + all standard local models
Pro$699/yearCommercial rights, priority cloud rendering

Free Trial — Topaz offers a free demo (no credit card), but every export is watermarked, which makes evaluating frame-interp output for production work effectively impossible. Community discussion of model selection is active on the r/TopazLabs subreddit if you want real-world user reports before subscribing.

Pros & Cons of Topaz Frame Interpolation

Pros

  • Three specialized models — different motion profiles, no one-size-fits-all compromise
  • Aion's large-motion handling — best-in-class on 4K sports/drone work
  • Granular FPS targets — 60, 120, 240 fps and custom values
  • Fast variants — Apollo Fast and Chronos Fast for batch work

Cons

  • $299/year subscription — no perpetual option since October 2025
  • Watermarked trial — can't evaluate finished output without paying
  • Slow Aion at 4K — 23+ min for 30-second 4K clips on RTX 4070
  • Steep model selection learning curve — picking wrong model wastes a full render

Best Alternative: UniFab Smoother AI

UniFab Smoother AI is the closest like-for-like alternative when you want Topaz Video AI frame interpolation quality without the annual subscription. It ships in two modes — Fast and High Quality — and is bundled into the $319.99 lifetime UniFab All-In-One suite alongside 21 other tools (Upscaler, HDR Upconverter, Denoise, Stabilizer, and more).

The following video is about UniFab vs Topaz on frame interpolation, which allows you to more clearly and intuitively see how the processing effect is:

Topaz vs UniFab — Frame Interpolation Head-to-Head

Same hardware (RTX 4070 + Ryzen 7 5700G), same source clips, same target FPS.

original vs topaz vs unifab - frame interpolation
AspectUniFab Smoother AITopaz (Chronos / Apollo / Aion)
SetupOne model, two quality presetsChoose between 5 model variants
Speed (1080p 30→60)~12-14 fps~7-8 fps (Chronos / Apollo)
Speed (4K 30→60)~3-4 fps~1.3 fps (Aion)
Visible artifacts on handheldMinimal at defaultMinimal with Apollo, slight with Chronos
Visible artifacts on 4K fast panMinimal at HQBest with Aion (slowest)
Built-in editor
Output watermark on trial❌ No watermark✅ Watermarked
Price
  • UniFab Smoother AI: $89.99 lifetime
  • UniFab All-In-One: $319.99 lifetime (22+ Tools, including Smoother AI)
$299/year subscription

Verdict: UniFab is the best Topaz Alternative, it matches Topaz on quality for mainstream FPS-conversion work and runs ~1.5–2× faster on the same hardware. Topaz's edge appears in 4K + heavy-motion edge cases where Aion's specialized training pulls slightly ahead. For everyday content creators, UniFab's simpler workflow and lifetime pricing make it the better default.

5-Year TCO Comparison

YearsUniFab All-In-OneTopaz Video AIYou Save with UniFab
1$319.99$299-$21
2$319.99 cumulative$598$278
3$319.99 cumulative$897$577
5$319.99 cumulative$1,495$1,175
10$319.99 cumulative$2,990$2,670

UniFab pays for itself by month 13. Every month after is pure savings.

My Verdict

Use Topaz Video AI frame interpolation if you specifically need Aion's 4K large-motion handling, you regularly process sports/drone work at 4K+, and you've already justified the $299/year subscription for other Topaz models like Starlight or Themis.

Use UniFab Smoother AI if you mostly do 1080p 24→60 conversion, social-media slow-motion, or HD frame-rate boosts. UniFab matches Topaz quality on these mainstream cases at ~1.5–2× the speed and a flat lifetime price.

FAQs about Topaz Video AI Frame Interpolation

What is the best Topaz frame interpolation model?

The best Topaz frame interpolation model depends on your source. Aion (2026) is best for 4K+ at large motion, Chronos is best for clean 24/30 → 60 fps cinema conversions, and Apollo is best for handheld or run-and-gun footage with organic motion. For most editors, Chronos is the safe default and Aion is the upgrade pick when 4K results matter more than render time.

Apollo vs Chronos in Topaz — which should I pick?

Pick Apollo if your footage has handheld camera shake, action-cam motion, or slight existing blur. Pick Chronos if your source is locked-off (tripod, gimbal, cinema rig) and you need precise FPS targets like 24→60 or 24→120 for slow motion. The apollo vs chronos topaz decision boils down to motion type, not quality — both are excellent within their ranges.

Is Topaz Video AI frame interpolation free?

No. Topaz video ai frame interpolation requires a Topaz Video AI subscription ($299/year for Personal or $699/year for Pro). The October 2025 retirement of the perpetual license means continued access requires recurring payment. A free demo is available, but every export is watermarked. UniFab Smoother AI's 30-day trial exports without watermarks.

Does Topaz Video AI frame interpolation work on Mac (Apple Silicon)?

Yes. Topaz Video AI runs on macOS 12+ with native Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) optimization via Metal acceleration. Frame interpolation works fine on M-series chips for HD work; 4K Aion benchmarks still favor NVIDIA RTX cards. UniFab Smoother AI offers FabCloud cloud processing as a fallback for Mac users without a high-end discrete GPU.

How long does Topaz frame interpolation take?

On RTX 4070, Apollo runs ~7 fps for 1080p 30→60, Chronos runs ~8 fps, and Aion drops to ~1.3 fps for 4K 30→60. A 30-second 1080p clip takes 4–5 minutes; a 30-second 4K Aion job takes 23+ minutes. Apollo Fast and Chronos Fast roughly double throughput at a small quality cost.

What's the difference between Chronos and Chronos Fast?

Chronos targets maximum quality with full motion analysis; Chronos Fast uses a streamlined model that runs roughly 2× faster with a small fidelity penalty. For batch or long-form work, Chronos Fast is the right pick. For single-clip hero shots where every detail matters, the standard Chronos wins.

Can Topaz Video AI create slow motion?

Yes. Set a target frame rate higher than your source (e.g., 24 → 240 fps for 10× slow-mo) and Topaz will interpolate the missing frames. Chronos handles linear-motion slow-mo cleanly; Aion is the better pick for 4K slow-mo at heavy motion. Beyond 8–10× slow-mo, even AI interpolation can produce visible softening — use real high-frame-rate cameras when possible.

Is Topaz Aion better than Chronos?

Aion is better than Chronos for 4K+ at large motion — that's exactly what Aion was trained for. For 1080p clean cinema conversions or simple FPS boosts, Chronos is faster and produces equivalent quality. Don't burn 23 minutes on Aion for a 1080p 24→60 job that Chronos finishes in 4 minutes with the same result.

How does UniFab Smoother AI compare to Topaz frame interpolation?

UniFab Smoother AI matches Topaz Chronos and Apollo on most mainstream FPS conversions and runs about 1.5–2× faster on the same hardware in our tests. Topaz's Aion has a quality edge at 4K + heavy motion. UniFab's price is $319.99 lifetime (with 22 bundled tools) vs Topaz's $299/year subscription — UniFab breaks even by month 13.

Who should buy Topaz Video AI for frame interpolation?

Sports broadcasters, drone cinematographers, and pros who regularly process 4K+ footage with large motion will get the most value from Topaz Aion. Hobbyists, YouTubers, social-media creators, and anyone working primarily at 1080p will get better value from UniFab Smoother AI's lifetime license — same quality on the cases they actually shoot, ~50% lower year-one cost, and zero ongoing subscription.

avatar
Harper Seven
UniFab Editor
Harper joined the UniFab team in 2024 and focuses on video technology–related content. With a blend of technical insight and hands-on experience, she produces authoritative software reviews, clear user guides, technical blogs, and video tutorials that help users better understand and work with modern video tools. Outside of work, Harper enjoys photography, outdoor activities, and video editing, often exploring visual storytelling through creative practice.